Features and shortcomings of html5

J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Tue Feb 20 23:45:54 EST 2018


Thanks Terry, that's helpful. I get the feeling that we can do almost 
anything internal to LC's engine, but things that require a call out to 
the OS are harder.

I did a quick conversion of a simple stack way back when HTML5 was first 
released and got pretty good results, but the load time was murderous 
and I dropped it as unusable until it got faster. I haven't tried it 
since that was improved, maybe it's okay now.

The deal is, my client and I have fast internet connections and we're 
willing to wait a bit for the stack to load, but if this project goes 
through it could be used by anyone including, as she told me, "by people 
in Nairobi" who may be on slow connections or even cell data.

We're also considering writing mobile apps instead, but her customer is 
hoping to integrate directly with their web site.

At any rate, thanks for the feedback.

On 2/20/18 9:05 PM, Terry Judd via use-livecode wrote:
> I've converted a couple of interactive simulations to HTML5 and they worked and performed surprisingly well (once I'd removed and coded around a few wait statements). Multiple cards are fine but I haven't tried switching between stacks. Text display isn't that great out of the box but that shouldn't be too much of an issue unless you have pretty strict formatting requirements (you can load fonts but I'm not sure whether it's worth the trouble). The biggest drawback for me has been around networking but that seems to have been substantially improved in recent releases (I haven't had a chance to explore these yet).
> 
> It's certainly worth a quick try of exporting an existing stack with LC community and seeing what works and what doesn't to get a sense of whether a full on conversion is warranted.
> 
> Terry...
> 
> On 21/02/2018 10:25 am, "use-livecode on behalf of J. Landman Gay via use-livecode" <use-livecode-bounces at lists.runrev.com on behalf of use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
>      I've been asked if I can convert a stack to HTML5, which I haven't
>      worked with yet. I'd like to know, in general, what can be done and what
>      can't. What are the limitations?
>      
>      The examples I've seen are mostly basic, usually just a one-card stack
>      with image or graphic manipulations. I'm also aware of the fairly long
>      initial load time, though I guess that's been cut back a bit. The stack
>      I will be working with will require many cards, navigation, and possibly
>      changing stacks (probably in the same window.)
>      
>      What else would I need to consider?
>      
>      --
>      Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>      HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>      
>      _______________________________________________
>      use-livecode mailing list
>      use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>      Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
>      http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>      
>      
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 


-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com





More information about the Use-livecode mailing list