read larger data streams over sockets - broken?
brahma at hindu.org
Wed Dec 6 21:12:39 EST 2017
May not mean anything for your use case, but I have built an in-house revision control system for InDesign documents… it's been in use for several years after the death of Adobe VersionCue (which was a night mare anyway) our team loves it: super simple, never fails, we never lose data, ever.
I use shell commands for everything. not sure why you need sockets if you are just copy files around…from our Macs to the Synology server in the next room…
my long stack script just manages different
put format "mv \"someFile\", \"newFileName\" # into cmdRename
cp # similar strings
get shell cmdRename
and the OS does everything..
If you want to see the stack you are welcome. It's being used (or was) by some publication team in Singapore for the same work.
On 12/6/17, 1:52 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Phil Davis via use-livecode" <use-livecode-bounces at lists.runrev.com on behalf of use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
Is anyone else having problems with moving multi-MB data streams across
sockets in LC 8?
I support a LAN-based system that relies on sockets to move data between
server and clients. The server's response to a single client request
will often consist of several hundred KB to several MB of data. Until LC
8 the successful approach has been:
More information about the Use-livecode