Community standards for a LEGO kit?

Richmond richmondmathewson at
Mon May 5 11:45:32 EDT 2014

On 05/05/14 16:39, Charles E Buchwald wrote:
> There are DropTools, PowerTools, tmControl, MobGUI, and some others which I'm sure I'm forgetting, so I daresay it's an idea that's been attempted a few times.
> I like very much the idea of "a LEGO kit" for, let's say, casual or beginning programmers. I've known many designers who dabble in programming who would find such a thing very useful for prototyping UI/UX. The few times I've shown LIveCode to kids, the drag-and-drop stuff is a nice place to start.
> I think the users who are most likely to really get into that LEGO kit are likely to do so with the Community version. What's the possibility of a community effort towards defining a standard, or some kind of interoperability, for LEGO-like components?
> - Charles

There is no earthly reason why a LEGO kit cannot be designed as an 
GUI/front-end to float on Livecode: and I'm sure there would be quite a 
demand for it were
one designed.

There are other possibilities to. Here's one of them :

this is a prototype agent-led interface for Livecode that guides 
teachers and so on through a decision
tree system to make stacks for content delivery and reinforcement.

The code is "up for grabs" if anyone can leverage it and go further with it.


More information about the Use-livecode mailing list