Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

[Richmond]

On 04/13/2013 11:43 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
> that is not the same thing.  The PS plugin uses another technique to
> invisibly imbed the code in the photo.
>
> Gimp and others use a graphic overlay, which degrades / cheapens / uglifies
>   the image.

You are quite right.

But, how, if the code is invisible can it be seen by those who wish to 
check if the image is copyrighted or not?

-------------------

Of course, one could open an image with a hex editor and type in one's 
copyright details
and save it again, and that would serve.

https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/bless/  { just tried that, and 
it is fine ]

Richmond.

>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 04/13/2013 09:29 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
>>
>>> Photoshop has a plugin and a paid service to apply invisible watermarks to
>>> images. They've had this for over 20 years.
>>> As most serious photographers have photoshop, I would assume it's been
>>> used
>>> a lot over the years, even pre-internet.
>>>
>> http://graphicssoft.about.com/**od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-**
>> watermark.htm<http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-watermark.htm>
>>
>>
>> Richmond.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode>
>>
>
>