Non_Open Source materials being embedded in OS stacks/standalones.

[stephen barncard]

that is not the same thing.  The PS plugin uses another technique to
invisibly imbed the code in the photo.

Gimp and others use a graphic overlay, which degrades / cheapens / uglifies
 the image.


On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 04/13/2013 09:29 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
>
>> Photoshop has a plugin and a paid service to apply invisible watermarks to
>> images. They've had this for over 20 years.
>> As most serious photographers have photoshop, I would assume it's been
>> used
>> a lot over the years, even pre-internet.
>>
>
> http://graphicssoft.about.com/**od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-**
> watermark.htm<http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/gimptutorials/ss/graphic-watermark.htm>
>
>
> Richmond.
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode>
>



-- 



Stephen Barncard
San Francisco Ca. USA

more about sqb  <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar>