Naive Question #108: Passwording stacks.

[william humphrey]

I agree. Use short words. Always.


On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:32 PM, J. Landman Gay <jacque at hyperactivesw.com>wrote:

> On 4/13/13 2:06 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
>  Setting and using protected stacks is a feature of the commercial
>> version of LC and is explicitly not supported in the OSS version.
>>
>> By design.
>>
>> That's how it's supposed to work.
>>
>> You can NOT use passwords to protect stacks in the OSS version.
>>
>> If it's still not clear let me know and I'll use shorter words.
>>
>>
> LOL. "Password no work."
>
> I don't get all the outrage. The security module omission was noted in the
> Kickstarter description and is footnoted in the RR web page that explains
> the differences between the commercial and OSS versions (and it's the only
> difference.) The logic behind the omission makes sense to anyone who does
> commercial work and needs to protect their IP.
>
> Richmond, I was poking fun at you because you wanted to password protect
> your work while using an OSS app that would have exposed your password to
> everyone if it had included the code for it.
>
>
> --
> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode>
>



-- 
http://www.bluewatermaritime.com