ambassador at fourthworld.com
Mon Feb 14 00:19:25 EST 2011
Monte Goulding wrote:
> On 14/02/2011, at 3:43 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>> Sunday, February 13, 2011, 7:49:38 PM, you wrote:
>>> I believe you will have to add the substack with the behavior
>>> buttons on it to the stackfiles too because the behavior rugged id
>>> doesn't include a mainstack reference.
>> Urk. That's quite a gotcha. Is there a bug filed against this?
> No idea, I never thought of it as a bug until you suggested it ;-)
I don't know that I'd call it a bug, since any stack holding behavior
definition buttons must be loaded into memory before an object can use
those scripts, and all stacks (whether main or sub) can be addressed by
their unique name once they're loaded.
If you can find a way to break this I'd be interested in learning, but
alas with the limitations of loading behavior definitions the stack
addressing shouldn't pose a problem.
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv
More information about the use-livecode