Hopefully a simple question

[Mike Bonner]

Exactly what I was looking for, thank you again!

Alejandro, thanks for the walkingman stack, I may actually be able to wrap
my head around that one.

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:56 AM, wayne durden <wdurden at gmail.com> wrote:

> For the part about setting up the graphic, what it sounds like you are
> after
> is typically referred to as making seamless tiles.  In many graphic
> programs
> there is an "offset filter".  I think you are describing the gist, a 50%
> horizontal and vertical offset, and then you smooth out the imperfections
> along the two central axis afterwards using a clone tool, or smudge or
> blur....
>
> There are many tutorials/explanations around once you know the term you are
> looking for..
>
> Here is one:
>
> http://www.cadtutor.net/dd/photo/seamless/seamless.html
>
> Wayne
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Mike Bonner <bonnmike at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much! Lots of stuff way over my head so far, but i'll
> stick
> > with it till I get it.  By the way, 'wrap' is very helpful for this sort
> of
> > thing.
> >
> > Side question, if I wanted to use aerial style photos for my tiles, there
> > is
> > a method to set the initial graphic up so that it will 'mesh' with itself
> > on
> > any edge.  This is just a simple right/left, up/down duplication with a
> > reverse and flip right? (sounds like i'm describing a dive) at which
> point
> > the consolidated image can be split into tile sized chunks and assigned
> > locations. And while on the subject, does anyone know of a utility that
> > will
> > split a large image into chucks based on a grid?  Meaning cut it into
> 40x40
> > chunks, and save each chunk with positional name for easy re-assembly.
> >
> > Thanks for all the help again all.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Alejandro Tejada <
> capellan2000 at gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > Download this stack, too:
> > >
> > > http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/alejandro/stacks/walkingman_2.zip
> > >
> > > After you change the names of variables and controls to a
> > > namespace familiar to your coding style, this script could
> > > be useful and, hopefully, optimized for general use. :-D
> > >
> > > Have a nice weekend!
> > >
> > > Al
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Hopefully-a-simple-question-tp2552934p2553442.html
> > > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > use-revolution mailing list
> > > use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-revolution mailing list
> > use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> >
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>