._ files

Robert Brenstein rjb at robelko.com
Thu Mar 9 13:49:20 EST 2006


>Robert Brenstein wrote:
>>For those wondering about those ._ files, here is the explanation 
>>from the "guilty" party, Apple itself:
>>
>>http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106510
>>
>>For most files, these ._ are actually empty and in case of Rev 
>>stacks safely ditched.
>
>So in all cases where the file has no resource fork (many Classic 
>file, most OS X files, and just about all Rev stacks, MP3s, MPEGs, 
>and more) it's merely a waste of time and space.
>
>That Apple provides no option for the user to be able to decide 
>whether this happens is an unfortunate design decision.
>
>That Apple does this for files that have no resource fork is a bug.
>
>That is, it would be a bug but another poster here already pointed 
>out that no software vendor in the world 'cept RunRev ever ships 
>anything with known bugs. ;)
>
>--
>  Richard Gaskin
>  Managing Editor, revJournal


Well, no, it is not exactly a bug in the way you present it. I 
simplified above (distorted the truth if you wish) saying that files 
are empty: they contain at least a single line with Finder info, like 
file type and creator, which is good enough reason to create that 
file even for files with no resource fork.

Robert



More information about the Use-livecode mailing list