Revdocs on a wiki
Dennis Brown
see3d at writeme.com
Thu Oct 27 15:08:54 EDT 2005
By the same token, having a link to the wiki from the built-in docs,
would obviate the need to duplicate the same info in the wiki. Only
the additional information need be in the wiki.
However, if the internal docs could download a corrected definition
from the wiki, then there is a good reason to have the complete
definition included. Could bring up the possibility of an auto
update/notification:
Message: There is an updated definition for "isNumber". Would you
like to download it now? Yes No View
Dennis
On Oct 27, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 2:23 PM, Mark Swindell wrote:
>
>
>> Using the existing docs as a starting point would be optimal, in
>> my view.
>>
>
> Exactly, otherwise there will be a wiki with many blank or
> placeholder pages which cannot completely support the user's
> inquiries - which ultimately results in a tool which is not used.
>
> It would also be best if each page in the official documentation
> could link directly to the wiki page for the same term or item. If
> you can't easily get to the information from within the Rev
> environment there will be far less users of the system.
> --
> Troy
> RPSystems, Ltd.
> http://www.rpsystems.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list