Stacks in Memory

[Bob Sneidar]

yup

Bob S


> On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:34 , Knapp Martin via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> Did you check revLoadedStacks()?
> 
> Marty
> 
>> On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hmmm... I have all three set on my mainstack and when I close it, the stack and it's substacks are not in memory. However, stacks I started using are. 
>> 
>> Bob S
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 5, 2018, at 10:49 , Knapp Martin via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> To answer my own question, although the Property Inspector will allow you to set both the destroyStack and cantDelete properties of a stack to true, cantDelete (when true) blocks destroyStack. I’d set cantDelete to true so that I wouldn’t accidentally delete a stack or sub stack. But generally, when I close a stack I want it removed from memory. So I’ve set cantDelete to false for now.
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 5, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Knapp Martin <martyknappster at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I have all my stacks configured with destroyStack and destroyWindow (gotta love those names!) set to true. And yet after I close them, if I check the revLoadedStacks() it shows that they and their subStacks are still loaded in memory. What do I need to do to get them out of memory?? Using LC 9.0.1 (rc3). I don’t see “obliterateStacks” in the dictionary ;)
>>>> 
>>>> Marty
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode