Script Only Stack Architecture
Monte Goulding
monte at appisle.net
Mon Mar 28 23:55:10 EDT 2016
Yes, it was the mix of code that should have an object scope and code that was fine to have a application wide scope that I was commenting on Matt.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Mar 2016, at 2:46 PM, Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com> wrote:
>
> Matt Maier wrote:
>
> > Monte got annoyed that I did something like that instead of setting
> > behaviors. So it might be better to write behaviors in script-only
> > stacks and then set them onto the various controls, rather than
> > managing the controls all the way from the library stack(s).
>
> Behaviors are good. And so are libraries. They're not mutually exclusive.
>
> "Nothing is true. Everything is permitted."
>
> --
> Richard Gaskin
> Fourth World Systems
> Software Design and Development for Desktop, Mobile, and Web
> ____________________________________________________________
> Ambassador at FourthWorld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list