Players in HTML5 - ETA for Full Functionality?

Peter Haworth pete at lcsql.com
Fri Feb 26 15:24:09 EST 2016


I agree, I think that's what he means.  Wasn't there a personal use license
at one point?  I seem to recall that standalones built with it displayed a
splash screen for 10 seconds at startup.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:15 PM J. Landman Gay <jacque at hyperactivesw.com>
wrote:

> On 2/26/2016 1:38 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
> > I don't understand why the OSS version won't work for you if it's a
> 'hobby'
> > thing
>
> I understand what he means. The OSS version would work fine, but that's
> not the point. His point is that he thinks LC is losing money from those
> who would like to contribute by purchasing a license at a reduced rate
> (possibly restricted to personal use only, or something similar I'm
> guessing.)
>
> It isn't that there is no path forward, but rather that he thinks the
> current licensing model is costing the company some sales. I don't know
> if that's true or not, I'm just playing interpreter.
>
> --
> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>



More information about the use-livecode mailing list