hair-pulling frustration
J. Landman Gay
jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Tue Nov 11 16:33:46 EST 2014
On 11/11/2014, 3:16 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> So while we can't be expected to test everything, if we only test our
> own apps with new builds that's usually all we need for our own work.
> Collectively, if we call just ensured that new features get implemented
> in ways we need, we'll all have what we want.
If it's easy to report a bug, I do it. The lack of command key
functionality for example. I can just describe a procedure to follow.
Demonstrating a problem with an image redraw is easy and only requires a
single card with an image and a few lines of script. I jump on that sort
of thing right away.
What usually stops me is the need to create a separate, stripped-down
stack to demonstrate a more complicated bug. I completely understand the
need for this, especially in my case where the original stack is huge
and complex, and I wouldn't expect RR to plow through all that. But
extracting the exact set of circumstances that reproduce the problem
without including all the surrounding code can sometimes be a whole
afternoon's work or more, so I don't do it. I just hope someone else has
a simpler example and will report it for me instead.
I know when I do this that I'm not helping myself very much, but there's
too much going on to do otherwise.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list