bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com
Fri Apr 4 03:29:36 CEST 2014
I wonder if they are taking advantage of color profiling now? This happened a whay back when Adobe introduced color correction to it’s line of products. Colors that looked and printed JUST FINE before, were now so incredibly off that old projects became unusable without major reworking.
It may be that the images have embedded profiles that were being ignored before, but are now being taken into account.
On Apr 2, 2014, at 13:25 , J. Landman Gay <jacque at hyperactivesw.com> wrote:
> Has anyone noticed a difference in screengamma in the last couple of releases? I've got some images here that look darker on Mac than they did a while back (not sure when it changed, but it's only a few weeks.) Setting the screengamma in the message box to 2.2 fixes it, but the default 1.7 used to be okay.
> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode