ID's are settable???
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Thu Jan 13 15:20:26 EST 2011
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> DunbarX wrote:
>> So the id of a new object is indexed from the current stack ID.
>> I thought (for no reason at all) it was the other way around,
>> that the stack took on the id of a new object.
>> Unless I misunderstand, I think the difference is
> Not really imho. The engine looks at the stack ID, creates a new
> object, gives it that ID then increments the stack ID. Otherwise
> it would be like arguing whether an increase in the bank balance
> caused a deposit, or the deposit changed the bank balance. :-)
> (GOD I love analogies!)
I think we're at the point, as Paul might say, where we're picking fly
poop out of pepper, but since we've already gone this far:
Your sense of this seems to mirror my own, in which the stack "gives"
the ID to the object, rather than that the stack "took" the ID from the
For any practical purpose, it doesn't matter and we can't know which
occurs first (though I suppose Mark Waddingham could chime in here and
tell us which line in the source occurs before the other).
All I know is that by the time we're able to know anything about the
IDs, both the most highest-ID object in the stack and the stack itself
have the same ID.
I'll leave it to the philosophers to determine which "gives" the ID to
the other, spending my time instead pondering the bigger question: if a
stack crashes on a machine that isn't running, does it make a noise? ;)
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv
More information about the Use-livecode