AW: Best Practices using globals vs. custprops?
Tiemo Hollmann TB
toolbook at kestner.de
Fri Jun 22 07:35:38 EDT 2007
Hi Dave, this really is a "hard fact" assuming I will never have same object
names as others, what is less risky, living in germany :) Thanks for
Von: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com
[mailto:use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag von Dave Cragg
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Juni 2007 13:14
An: How to use Revolution
Betreff: Re: Best Practices using globals vs. custprops?
On 22 Jun 2007, at 09:50, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
> I really don't see any difference between using globals or properties
Scott pointed out some of the problems of using globals. One
particular problem in Rev is that we can easily share stacks with
each other. If you use someone else's stack (as a plugin, a library,
or as part of your application), and if there is a global in that
peron's stack that has the same name as one in your own stack,
unexpected things are likely to happen. That is why it's usually
advisable to use some kind of naming strategy for your globals. For
example, start all gloabls with "g" plus your applications name.
gMyAppUserName, gMyAppUserID, etc.
But that's only reducing the risk of name conflicts; it doesn't
Custom properties don't have this problem as thy are tied to objects
(stacks, cards, etc.) therefore it's OK to have custom properties
with the same name. (the userID of stack "myApp" versus the userID of
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
More information about the Use-livecode