Me, me, me [bug ref 3420]
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Thu Nov 16 09:38:11 CST 2006
Bernard Devlin wrote:
> I decided to look in bugzilla myself, and I found that it was indeed
> entered as a bug by the ever-gracious Mr. Gaskin on 23.3.06. Marcus
> from Runrev accepted that it "is pathological" and should probably
> be considerd a bug (and it is indeed still open as a bug). When I
> searched back through the archive for March this year, I found there
> was already a lengthy discussion of this between you, Mark Smith, and
> Richard. All three of you agreed it seemed to be a bug, and Richard
> even told you he put it in bugzilla for you (in fact, he entered 2
> bug reports for it).
> What then is the point of you bringing up the matter again and asking
> us to discuss if this behaviour is buggy, when you must know full
> well that it has already been accepted as a bug? Not only did you
> not have to go to the trouble of entering this bug, according to
> bugzilla you haven't even bothered to vote for it yourself!
> I fail to understand your conception of yourself as someone who wants
> Runrev to do well. Your words and actions on this list suggest the
> opposite to me.
> I wish I had the magnanimty of Richard Gaskin.
You know the old saying that ignorance is bliss? For myself, the secret
to whatever magnanimity I might have is simply being absent-minded: I'd
long forgotten that I logged that bug. :)
Now that you've refreshed my memory, it does rather feel like a waste of
time to entertain these sorts of broken-record threads.
Here's the URL to the BZ:
Let's please not spend more time on this bug, okay Dave? We've done
everything that can be done, long ago.
And Dave, I do hope you've signed up to participate in the v2.7.5 beta
Managing Editor, revJournal
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
More information about the use-livecode