video at the conference?

[Stephen Barncard]

That's my point - it shouldn't be an afterthought that requires any 
participant of the conference to be "stepping up to the plate" as a 
volunteer. Running a camera is a full time activity that should be 
done by someone who does it a lot.

I'm quite talented with audio and video and could do this quite well, 
but I don't want to be the audio-visual guy. I'm going the conference 
to learn more about Rev.

If the speakers and presentations are nearly as good this year as 
last year, they should be preserved as a resource. Good production 
values make the presenters look better too - and their acceptance of 
the video.

If there wasn't a provision in the budget for this.... then... sorry 
I brought it up.

sqb


>Well,
>
>of course it would be better to do it right than to do it wrong.  I just
>don't see anybody stepping up to the plate to do it right.
>
>Judy
>
>On Tue, 23 May 2006, Stephen Barncard wrote:
>
>>  I'd rather see reasonable lighting and a microphone at least on the
>>  podium before worrying about obfuscating bad video with clever
>>  editing. A full time camera operator that is not a participant is
>  > essential.
>

-- 
stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -