[OT] xTalk Legal Status

[Dan Shafer]

Mark...

I think your summary is correct.

Dan

On 7/22/06, Mark Schonewille <m.schonewille at economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> If you interprete me saying that the languages themselves are
> copyrighted, then I am probably wrong, but you really can't reverse
> engineer Apple's HyperTalk engine or SuperCard's compiler, not to
> mention Revolution's. If you want to be really sure, though, read the
> licenses and take copyright laws into account.
>
> Best,
>
> Mark
>
> P.S. This is my last post regarding this subject, as I feel this is
> off-topic and I am not an expert in copyright issues.
>
> --
>
> Economy-x-Talk
> Consultancy and Software Engineering
> http://economy-x-talk.com
> http://www.salery.biz
>
> Download ErrorLib at http://economy-x-talk.com/developers.html and
> get full control of error handling in Revolution.
>
>
>
> Op 22-jul-2006, om 20:13 heeft Dan Shafer het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Mark...
> >
> > Are you sure? Copyrighting language syntax is pretty tricky stuff
> > and I'm
> > not at all sure that ANY of those *languages* was ever so protected
> > or is
> > now.
> >
> > I'm not saying you're wrong, just wondering what your source of such
> > certainty is.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author
http://www.shafermedia.com
Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought"
>From http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html