Linux Builder problem: Wrong stdc++ libs linked

[Richard Gaskin]

Klaus Major wrote:

> Moin Marc,
>> Is there are a way to hinder the customer from peeking into the code - 
>> and, even more important, to avoid him easily seeing that he is 
>> dealing with an Interpreter and a script inside? Please don't get me 
>> wrong on this, I am not going to "abuse" Revolution and I am not 
>> "ashamed" to use such tools (if I was I wouldn't have bought it), I 
>> simply want to protect my IP.

Of course.  Most of us password-protect our commercial aps.

> If you add a password to your stack(s), the scripts cannot be read by an 
> editor anymore.
> But i don't know how "safe" this build-in encryption is...

It's said to be a derivative of DES, with equivalent security.

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation
  ___________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com       http://www.FourthWorld.com