Fix it before moving ahead

[Dar Scott]

On Thursday, March 11, 2004, at 06:33 AM, Graham Samuel wrote:

> I also think that the idea of voting for a bug to be fixed is deeply 
> flawed

Given limited resources to apply to a class of bugs, how would they be 
applied?  They would be applied sequentially first to those most 
important in that class.  What is most important?  That is determined 
by a mix of severity and use and bug-interaction.  A bug in a popular 
feature at a normal level might be addressed before a bug at major 
level that is rarely used.  How would RunRev get some indication of 
popularity?  Maybe support instances and bugzilla voting.

Voting can also be applied to addressing a temporary workaround.

With limited resources, choices must be made.

Dar Scott