ActiveX and RR

[K]

Not all Java Virtual Machines are created equal!  A company I worked for shipped a product that required the SUN virtual machine (not the MSFT look alike).  The most significant compliant from Fortune 500 administrators/companies was the deployment of the Java Virtual Machine.

K


-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)



 --- On Tue 08/10, Troy Rollins < troy at rpsystems.net > wrote:
From: Troy Rollins [mailto: troy at rpsystems.net]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:39:29 -0400
Subject: Re: ActiveX and RR

<br>On Aug 10, 2004, at 7:41 AM, K wrote:<br><br>>  As far as interfacing with Java I see no need to haul a 40+ MB <br>> virtual machine around!<br><br>Is there such a thing as a machine that doesn't have Java installed <br>anymore?<br><br>I guess I don't know, on OSX the latest VM is just part of the OS, and <br>Java apps don't take any addition time to launch, and perform quite <br>well.<br><br>--<br>Troy<br>RPSystems, Ltd.<br>http://www.rpsystems.net<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!