'hack' test results

[Rick Harrison]

on 4/20/2002 1:23 PM, JohnRule at aol.com at JohnRule at aol.com wrote:
> 
> I just did another 'hack' test...with MCRipper this time:
> 
> http://www.inspiredlogic.com/mc/ripper.html
> 
> It cannot 'rip' password protected stacks (at least I couldn't get it to) so
> that is a relief.
> 
> MCRipper will 'rip' invisible objects (including any text or scripts) even if
> the stack is password protected. So the conclusion...any information in text
> fields (even hidden fields) is not totally safe.
> 

John,

I did a test with MCRipper.  I built a stand alone stack
which was password protected and used the encryption option.

MCRipper didn't even show the stack so I could open it.
Revolution also didn't see the stack.

How then do you believe that this is hackable?  Or have
I missed something somewhere?

Thanks,

Rick Harrison