MC-REV Event similar to AppleEvent?
Robert Brenstein
rjb at rz.uni-potsdam.de
Wed Jan 21 16:56:38 EST 2004
> > What is the benefit of parsing an event rather than handling them
>directly?
>
>I need to be able to update a stack/card script in a standalone, and I
>cannot because of the limit imposed. The stack script contains (mostly)
>typical handlers (i.e. openStack, resumeStack, etc.) for handling messages
>that are sent to the stack. If I had a 'single' handler in the script that
>could handle 'all' stack messages, I 'might' be able to update the script
>because the size of the script would be greatly reduced. I really wish
>RunRev would allow 'some' things in a stand-alone for licensed users, or a
>special license for increasing the script limit 'just a litlle'.
>
Yah, tough problem. I have been trying to find a way to increase
those limits but no luck so far. Last year, Kevin posted to this list
that they may consider some special licencing, but there was no
follow up. I guess they can't justify making their operation more
complicated on account of a few users.
On the other hand, I am not clear how having a single event will help
you with the limits. If you can break down the scripts into
functional chunks, then you can stuff them into a series of buttons
or fields (hidden) and call them as needed. If you are after updating
standalone-controlled stacks, it may be easier to make another
standalone that opens the stack and modifies it. The standalone self
can't be modified.
Robert Brenstein
More information about the metacard
mailing list