MC IDE discussion list

[Richard Gaskin]

> <Quote> Actually, I would not mind continuing such a
> general list for metacard as we have now. The Rev list
> has more noise and significantly more traffic. People
> who would likely remain on the MC list will be the
> hardcore MC users and thus likely interested in at
> least theoretical participation in changes to GUI. A
> separate list for GUI developers can be always spun
> off if the situation warrants it.</quote>

I like it because it takes a step out of the process. ;)

To some degree this has been happening naturally already:  most of us on
this list also subscribe to the larger Rev list, so if this list has a
little more IDE-specific traffic and maybe a less language discussion than
some would prefer, then there's already a great community for that.

But moreover, I don't think there are likely to be very many IDE-specific
posts, since it seems what most MC users want is to maintain iits
simplicity.

I guess all we need now is for someone from the mother ship to lay down some
ground rules on the mechanics of this process.  Dr. Raney, what's the word?

-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site
 ___________________________________________________________
 Ambassador at FourthWorld.com       http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717                       AIM: FourthWorldInc