Encrypting Stack Breaks Field References

J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Tue Dec 22 19:09:04 EST 2020


Unless you specifically need text files for git or some other reason, you 
don't really need script-only stacks. Put the script in a button and then 
put it in use or use it as a backscript. It will be encrypted when the 
stack is. Another advantage to keeping scripts in the stack is that they 
work with remote debugging, unlike text based scripts.

Brian Milby's script tracker is also a way to get the best of both worlds. 
It saves scripts out to text files for uploading to github while keeping 
the advantages of stack-based scripts.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On December 22, 2020 3:24:11 PM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode 
<use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> What he said. The promise of creating standalones and encrypted stacks 
> containing code sounds promising, but there are caveats. It begs the 
> question, how do we encrypt script only stacks or libraries? I don’t use 
> encrypted stacks because my code is for internal use only, but if I ever 
> went commercial, this would be something I would need.
>
> Bob S
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode 
>> <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ron Noice wrote:
>>
>> ? My program (built with LC 9.6.1 Indy Windows) contains a large number
>> > of references to fields by variables.
>> ...
>> > only when I encrypt it does it fight back. Here's a simplified example
>> > of what I'm doing:
>> >
>> > create group "grpTree"
>> > ...
>> > copy fld "baseBox" to grp "grpTree"
>>
>> ^ that's your issue.
>>
>> Copying objects is disallowed in an encrypted stack, since of course once 
>> an object is copied it could be pasted into an unencrypted stack, and thus 
>> expose the source.
>>
>> You might consider moving the code from the encrypted stack to an encrypted 
>> behavior object, leaving the stack where copying must be done unencrypted.
>>
>> But if these objects are being copied only by script for the purpose of 
>> automatically building out a UI, without a need to alter the user's 
>> clipboard, you might consider using the clone command instead.
>>
>> --
>> Richard Gaskin
>> Fourth World Systems
>> Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode






More information about the use-livecode mailing list