Cocoa

Terence Heaford t.heaford at btinternet.com
Sun Mar 9 11:02:32 EDT 2014


I can’t make a decision on whether or not it is wasted because RunRev have not made a statement on what a port to Cocoa is?

Even though they are working on it they do not seem to want to expose their intentions.

Why?

RunRev, not me, said they would port LC to Cocoa. I would just like to use it.
Because RunRev stated they were going to port LC to Cocoa I thought LC was worth a try.
I am trying it, in a limited way and my view is that it could do with improvement in the Mac arena by having access to native controls, not emulated.

So, what does the port entail and what is the final goal and timescale?

I suppose it’s a simple question and that could be answered simply.

But hasn’t, why?

I suppose when you purchase something you firstly evaluate if it is what you require.

To evaluate it you need all the facts.

When will RunRev publish the facts about the Cocoa port?

All the best

Terry







On 9 Mar 2014, at 14:10, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So far I see no sign of RunRev doing anything about my 'bit'; that does not make me regret my contribution at all, because
> I know very well that my contribution goes towards making LC better all round, and am sure that my 'bit' will be sorted out,
> eventually, when the good folk in Edinburgh get down to the bottom of my very long list of things, that in the great scheme of things,
> have higher priority than my selfish little 'bit' (which, considering how obscure it is, probably doesn't fuss anybody else at all).
> 
> Richmond.
> 





More information about the use-livecode mailing list