Password protection?

[Mark Schonewille]

Hi Richmond,

Open the standalone in a text editor and copy the scripts, 
particularlythe license checking routines. Then use those scripts to 
create your own key. I think that's enough difference.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other 
colour spaces. http://www.color-converter.com

Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner" 
http://qery.us/3fi

On 5/21/2013 17:10, Richmond wrote:
> So, I made a stack containing 1 button containing the script:
>
> on mouseUp
>     put "Wotcha"
> end mouseUp
>
> then made Linux, Mac and Windows standalones using LC 4.5 with a password
> protecting the stack.
>
> then made Linux, Mac and Windows standalones using LC 6.0.1 OSS (with NO
> password protection).
>
> this all done on a box running Ubuntu 12.04.
>
> The standalones for each OS from the 2 LC versions look functionally the
> same.
>
> What I want to do is learn how I can "crack" the non-password protected
> standalones
> so that I am actually convinced there is a REAL difference between them
> and those
> that, supposedly, contain password protected stacks.
>
> Even the Macintosh standalone, which is not a monolithic file but a
> series of nested directories and folders,
> does not have anything obviously different in either of the standalones,
> nor anything that looks like a
> raw stack.
>
> Richmond.