A small programming challenge

Alejandro Tejada capellan2000 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 15 21:38:58 EDT 2013


Hi,


Geoff Canyon-4 wrote
> I worked on this further over the weekend. I'll post again after I've
> formatted everything, but the result now handles any number of cubes from
> 3
> to 26, although anything more than about 14 will probably be too slow. For
> 4 cube puzzles the new code is about four times faster than my old code.
> For 12 cube puzzles it's >100 times faster. 
> I came up with a nice short cut.

and


Alex Tweedly wrote
> Let's see that gave me twenty minutes of fun coding to save 12 millisecs.
> Just as well I enjoyed it, because the time saving didn't justify the
> effort.

Deep bow to both Math Wizards! :D

Al



--
View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/A-small-programming-challenge-tp4663262p4663466.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




More information about the use-livecode mailing list