Why Does "remove" Actually "delete"?

[J. Landman Gay]

On 12/11/12 2:19 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:
> Thanks for the responses on this.  Apparently when using the term "group",
> the source card of the group is required (placing fails if you don't
> reference the source card).  If you use the term "background" you
> (apparently) don't need to specify the source card.
>
> And removing works fine in a simple test stack, so I'm at loss why the
> group is being deleted in my production stack.  But I used a workaround of
> copying a group from one card to another so things are OK.

I'm sure you've checked, but is the "removed" group also missing from 
the backgroundnames?

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com