[FOSS] On the creation of Rev to Web tools
andre at andregarzia.com
Wed Sep 15 11:44:50 EDT 2010
there goes my thread :-(
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, wayne durden <wdurden at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Malte,
> I too have pondered the question. I ended up feeling that the "buy in"
> required by the commercial nature of the main product limits uptake by
> blood (generally poor) in numbers necessary to create open source momentum.
> I have watched Ruby go from zero to being on the radar in the interim, and
> few up and comers are going to latch onto runrev/livecode in the same way.
> The no cost versions of the product are limited by commercial necessity and
> those limits will always weigh on the balance of youngsters choosing
> the full package in a "free" language/IDE versus a reduced package here.
> It seems a by-product of the necessity of RunRev/Kevin/Markula/unknown
> ownership interests et al. needing to earn a return on their investment. I
> have been discouraged in concluding that while the base may grow it
> can never capture the explosive exponential growth phase that the truly
> successful open source languages have that only come with a couple orders
> magnitude of extra sets of eyeballs in the mix.
> The product remains a wonderful "secret weapon" but will always languish
> behind the frontier of the evolving landscape.
> I really wish that a wealthy benefactor like Bill Gates would buy the whole
> thing and release it all and let a thousand variations bloom and weed
> themselves out...
> Until it is absolutely no cost for the full version you simply won't get
> teens on board in number, the ones with unlimited time and no commercial
> obligations, and otaku like devotion to tackle the next new thing...
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
More information about the Use-livecode