Why are locking size and position treated as one?

[Andre Garzia]

Mark,

very good question, I have no answer.

You can fake your locks with script if you want to decouple them.

Cheers
andre

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com> wrote:

> I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought I'd try
> again.
>
> Why are locking size and position of an image inextricably linked?  They
> seem to me to be two separate entities.  I know how to get around the
> situation via script, but I don't know why there should be the inconvenience
> of having to "get around" anything.  Is there a good reason for this or is
> it just a legacy reality that could be changed?  Why not be able to drag an
> image around whose size is constrained?
>
> Mark_______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>



-- 
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.