answer as sheet showing on wrong stack

[Joe Lewis Wilkins]

Kay C:

I figured that was probably an issue, but didn't take the time to  
explore and think it through.

Sorry,

Joe Wilkins

On May 9, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:

> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepetoo at cox.net>  
> wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it make even more sense to have a prominent link on the New
>> RevOnLine to the Old RevOnLine? And vice versa? But that's too  
>> obvious!
>>
>
> Ah I don't think it's that easy.
>
> New RevOnline doesn't run in Rev 3.0 or earlier, so anyone going to
> RevOnline in Rev 2.6.1 will get Old RevOnline. Having a link to New
> RevOnline is pointless if they don't have Rev 3.5.
>
> The same could be said for those on Rev 3.5 who don't have an older  
> copy,
> but for those who do have old copies of Rev, whilst a link in New  
> RevOnline
> to Old RevOnline might be workable I don't see how this is going to  
> prevent
> wasted time looking for stacks in the wrong RevOnline if the creator  
> doesn't
> announce which particular RevOnline they've uploaded to.
>
> To me it's like stating "I've made an OS X app" vs "I've made a  
> Leopard
> app". One will have a bunch of Jaguar and Tiger users wasting time  
> trying to
> figure out why your app doesn't work. Reminds me of recent thread  
> about
> speaking accurately but still being ambiguous.