Reference Function Name Via Variable?

[Mark Schonewille]

Scott,

The easy way to do this might be to use a custom property instead of a  
function. Get the someProperty[pData1 & cr & pData2] of me. Perhaps  
someProperty[pData1][pData2] works too, I haven't tried that yet. Then  
again, why don't you simply put the function into a backscript?

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum

We are always looking for new projects! Feel free to contact us to  
discuss your custom software project!

On 15 jan 2009, at 20:45, Scott Rossi wrote:

> Hi List:
>
> Just curious...  Is there any way to construct a function using a name
> stored in a variable without resorting to "do"?  For example:
>
> on mouseUp
>   put "hello" into pData1
>   put "world" into pData2
>   put "shout" into test
>   do "answer" && test & "(pData1,pData2)"
> end mouseUp
>
> function shout pData1,pData2
>   return pData1 && pData2
> end shout
>
> Can the last line of the mouseUp handler be written without "do"?   
> I'm not
> against using "do", just wondering if there's another option.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Scott Rossi
> Creative Director
> Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design