3.0 Field numbering messed up

[Joe Lewis Wilkins]

Scott,

I understand; just feeling a bit argumentative this morning. Wrong  
side of the bed? (smile)

Thanks,

Joe Wilkins

On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:

> Joe -- it's not a backward compatibility issue, it's an ambiguity  
> issue.  If
> you say "field 1" in your scripts, Revolution has no way to know  
> whether you
> mean the first field on the card, or the field named "1", which  
> could really
> be the fifth field.  This is why you should use non-numeric-only  
> names as
> Mark suggested.
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott Rossi