Enhancements in your opinion?
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Mon May 8 15:20:20 EDT 2006
Bob Warren wrote:
> Richard Gaskin wrote:
> (A wealth of information - See his post!)
> "I don't know that the new message is needed, but I agree that a way to
> have a menu item which closes a stack and re-opens it fresh (to trigger
> the opening sequence of messages -- preOpenStack, preOpenCard,
> openStack, openCard, etc.) would be handy."
> - There are of course other ways in which this could be done, as I have
> suggested in the past. For example, saving the current project itself as
> a temp file and then provoking a revert at some point. However, it
> strikes me that the idea of independent compiling and shelling would be
> particularly easy to implement, avoiding the kinds of modifications
> which might lead to bloat and further instability of the IDE.
I'm not sure I follow: what constitutes "independent compiling and
Maybe I'll put it in my IDE. :)
Managing Editor, revJournal
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
More information about the Use-livecode