Enhancements in your opinion?

[Richard Gaskin]

Bob Warren wrote:
> Richard Gaskin wrote:
> 
> (A wealth of information - See his post!)

Thanks. :)

> Regarding:-
> 
> "I don't know that the new message is needed, but I agree that a way to
> have a menu item which closes a stack and re-opens it fresh (to trigger
> the opening sequence of messages -- preOpenStack, preOpenCard,
> openStack, openCard, etc.) would be handy."
> 
> - There are of course other ways in which this could be done, as I have 
> suggested in the past. For example, saving the current project itself as 
> a temp file and then provoking a revert at some point. However, it 
> strikes me that the idea of independent compiling and shelling would be 
> particularly easy to implement, avoiding the kinds of modifications 
> which might lead to bloat and further instability of the IDE.

I'm not sure I follow:  what constitutes "independent compiling and 
shelling"?

Maybe I'll put it in my IDE. :)

--
  Richard Gaskin
  Managing Editor, revJournal
  _______________________________________________________
  Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com