use-revolution Digest, Vol 30, Issue 23
mlange at lexicall.org
Sat Mar 11 14:33:12 EST 2006
Thanks for sharing this,
But as you made clear in your earlier post, you are only using
revolution for fun. I was myself very happy paying for a studio
license in this context, just for being given the opportunity to play
around at evening and week-end time. Have this "feel clever" feeling
because I was ready to rapidly assemble 2 text boxes, 3 buttons and
have them "do something".
For my part, I went up to an entreprise license. And then I started
to be unhappy. I know some people on this list make ample money from
their runrev activities. Making money was not what I was most
interested in. A paradox is that the fact that you don't make money
out of your hobby makes you more demanding about what you pay out of
your "hobby" budget. Strangely, you become a lot more unforgiving of
any default in the product you bought... because your money has been
spent, you cannot afford to buy a replacement before a few months.
The reason I reacted to Dan's email is that he used the analogy to a
photographer who is ready to pay a lot more for his lenses. I doubt
that the semi-serious hobbyist he was didn't take the time that each
penny he put into his hobby was well spent. I am sure his friend
chooses each one of his lenses carefully, taking into account the
intrinsic quality as well as long term reliability of the tool. I am
sure a story like the one Dan's told on a semi-serious-amateur
photographer list wouldn't have decided him to pay for a $200 lens
he was not ready to pay for, from the start. I am sure you do choose
your bikes carefully even if you are well aware you cannot afford
Lance Amstrong's one. I am sure that even if you buy your bikes out
of your hobby budget you still expect to be treated as a serious
I only encouraged Dan to focus on the aspects of intrinsic quality of
the product and customer support, as I believe they will have a lot
more impact on non profit users than what may appear to some as not
very subtle door salesman's tricks.
On 09/03/2006, at 4:57 PM, "Kay C Lan" <lan.kc.macmail at gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, then substitute me.
> I can fully relate to the story Dan posted as I basically used
> exactly the same logic when I upgraded from REV Express (free at
> the time) to REV DreamCard (may not have been called DreamCard) and
> then to REV Studio.
> REV Express disappeared and I was pretty ticked off at not having a
> 'free' version for hobbiests to 'play with'. I even emailed REV and
> let them know what I thought.
> But to put it into perspective, I 'play with' trains, and I spend
> more annually on model trains than REV.
> I enjoy cycling, and spend more on my bike annually than I do on
> REV. See my recent post - subject REV vs Visual Basic - on how I
> use REV to support my cycling.
> I enjoy computers, and whilst I LOVE Perl, MySQL and other
> freebies. I still spend more annually on computer hardware and
> software (excluding REV) than on REV alone. Then again children do
> form a large part of the software expenditure pie (games).
> So, I'm never going to make money out of my trains (apart from a
> few sound investments), my bike, or from REV. Although I still hope
> that one day I'll actually script something that is useful to
> someone else.
> Please feel free to 'check up' my story. I'd love to send you a
> photo of my Live Steam engine or my new road bike;-)
Marielle Lange (PhD), Psycholinguist
Alternative emails: mlange at blueyonder.co.uk,
Easy access to lexical databases http://
Supporting Education Technologists http://
More information about the Use-livecode