Dependence on Programming Experts
Viktoras Didziulis
viktoras at ekoinf.net
Thu Jul 13 06:18:30 EDT 2006
Dan,
it is not exactly so. Modern interpreters no longer interpret the code, they
first translate it to bytecode which is executed by the engine. Although I
do not know is this a case with Revolution engine, but adding just an option
to a translator makes no impact on execution of the bytecode. At least this
is the way Perl works, and it supports many ways of everything. When
describing performance of Runtime Rev engine then it is compared as equal to
Perl by the Runrev experts themselves. So there should not be any big losses
due to alternative syntaxes. But as Bjornke mentioned engine already has a
support for =. Evidently I have played too little with it, but I am happy
with this if it works with my mathematical formulas :-).
best!
Viktoras
-------Original Message-------
From: Dan Shafer
Date: 07/13/06 10:18:30
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Dependence on Programming Experts
The biggest problem with syntactic shortcuts as options is that they bloat
the interpreter/compiler and result in slower execution. It's inevitable. No
single change of this type is going to be noticeable, but you start down
that slippery slope and add a bunch of them and then people will start
comlaining the app is too slow.
On 7/12/06, John Vokey <vokey at uleth.ca> wrote:
>
> A bit late in the debate (but I am at my cottage with at best
> primitive dial-up):
>
>
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author
http://www.shafermedia.com
Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought"
>From http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list