the := operator (affectation

[Eric Chatonet]

Hello Richard,

> Since it would be optional as it is in other xTalks, nothing would  
> be lost.

Except the spirit :-)
Grasp all, lose all...

Le 23 juin 05 à 18:53, Richard Gaskin a écrit :

> Marielle Lange wrote:
>
>>> OTH, allowing ``a=4'' as a shorthand for ``put 4 into a'' harms
>>>
>> <nobody, and meets with the expediency criterion; just don't require
>>
>>> it.
>>>
>> Hi John,
>> I do often write myVar = x. But I like the fact that there is a  
>> different logic
>> for properties and variables.
>>     set the width to 100
>>     put 100 into myVar
>> You would loose this with the x = 4 syntax.
>>
>
> Since it would be optional as it is in other xTalks, nothing would  
> be lost.


Best Regards from Paris,

Eric Chatonet.
----------------------------------------------------------------
So Smart Software

For institutions, companies and associations
Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc.
Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch

Free plugins and tutorials on my website
----------------------------------------------------------------
Web site        http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email        eric.chatonet at sosmartsoftware.com/
Phone        33 (0)1 43 31 77 62
Mobile        33 (0)6 20 74 50 86
----------------------------------------------------------------