Forcing full compiling of a stack

[Frank D. Engel, Jr.]

What about building a stand-alone runtime?  That would require 
compilation, correct?

On Jul 21, 2004, at 1:44, John Rule wrote:

>> Is there a way to force full compiling of a stack?
>
> I haven't seen a response to this, so I will give it a try...
>
> My assumption is that ALL scripts are interpreted 'on the fly' no 
> matter
> what (meaning they are 'uncompiled'), so there is no way to make a 
> 'true'
> binary executable (optimized binary) using the IDE...which is an
> 'interpreter' only.
>
> Also, when a script editor is closed, the script is simply 'checked' 
> for
> errors (not compiled)...I could be wrong about this though.
>
> Is this what you are referring to Dar?
>
> JR
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:35:37 -0600
>> From: Dar Scott <dsc at swcp.com>
>> Subject: Forcing full compiling of a stack
>> To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
>> Message-ID: <F9B4B54A-DA83-11D8-AA41-000A9567A3E6 at swcp.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>>
>> Is there a way to force full compiling of a stack?
>>
>> Dar Scott
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>



________________________________________________________________
$0 Web Hosting with up to 120MB web space, 1000 MB Data Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Get It Now At www.doteasy.com