Qt vs Revolution

[Christopher Mitchell]

Also, at least on my powerbook, apps compiled with Qt have a giveaway 
"buzz" or hum when i move a window or panel.  See 
http://psi.affinix.com/ and see if it does it for you.

Also, as mentioned, this demonstrates how unMaclike the interface can 
be... It's pretty lame, and the pop up windows are all over the place.  
Later versions have been getting better but it's really kind of 
obnoxious so I use Fire instead for jabber.

Yours,
Chris
On Feb 14, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Alex Rice wrote:

>
> On Feb 14, 2004, at 10:59 AM, Dar Scott wrote:
>
>> I suggested to a customer that a new family of programs in their 
>> product be implemented in Revolution.  The customer did (at some 
>> level) consider Revolution, but decided to go with Qt.
>>
>> How would folks here compare these?
>
> I've never programmed in QT (Trolltech SDK). So you probably know as 
> much as I do :-)
>
> QT is a C++ application framework
> It's Windows/Linux/Mac OS X (No Mac Classic I think)
> It uses emulated widgets (maybe native look and feel, maybe no themes)
>
> So using QT would therefore take lots longer to develop with, and 
> would look less like a native app than a runrev one.
>
> However QT surely has a more advanced set of GUI controls, including I 
> am guessing spreadsheet and word processing controls.
>
> --
> Alex Rice | Mindlube Software | http://mindlube.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>