wait with messages...

[Dar Scott]

On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 02:47 AM, Dave Cragg wrote:

> repeat until <condition>
>   wait for messages
> end repeat
>
> It seemed the same as this:
>
> wait until <condition> with messages.

I think I get it.  Use the first for testing something that will be set 
by a callback. Use the second if there is no callback as in polling the 
shift key or calling an external.

It would be nice if there was a way to filter what messages got 
processed.

Dar Scott