Keeping relationships during a drag event.

Glen Bojsza gbojsza at gmail.com
Tue Dec 28 18:19:17 EST 2004


Well then I will travel down this path. 

thanks,

Glen


On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:07:49 -0600, J. Landman Gay
<jacque at hyperactivesw.com> wrote:
> On 12/28/04 3:22 PM, Glen Bojsza wrote:
> 
>  > Jacqueline / Chipp
>  >
>  > Thanks for the feedback.
>  >
>  > Chipp, your solution is perfect for me to work from.
>  >
>  > Jaqueline, I looked at the metacard example and the interesting point
>  > about it is that  it uses a single polygon line...even though it
>  > connects three separate graphics.
>  >
>  > I am curious to see if Chipp's solution would extend to this (or even
>  > if it can). When I start to have multiple images connected with
>  > multiple lines which solution would be easier to maintain ie adding
>  > and deleting connections?
>  >
>  > What would you choose?
> 
> I haven't looked at Chipp's, so I can't say for sure. But the MC way is
> pretty easy -- just add another 2-line set of coordinates to the
> "points" list for each new object. You can have an unlimited number of
> lines. If you use a script like the MC example to loop through all your
> images, the number of lines and their points will get calculated
> automatically each time the handler runs; you won't even have to do the
> math. Instead of "repeat with i = 1 to 3" you would use "repeat with i =
> 1 to the number of images".
> 
> This technique is also very fast.
> 
> --
> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>


More information about the use-livecode mailing list