pre-beta

Alex Rice alrice at ARCplanning.com
Mon Feb 3 12:05:01 EST 2003


On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 08:04  AM, Oliver Hardt wrote:
>
> 	i would really encourage you guys up there in scottland to tell us 
> what the real problem is.  i cannot believe this "testing" argument 
> any more.  honestly, i don't care whether it takes another year to 
> release the final version (because the current version is working for 
> me) -- just put the cards on the table.

It should have been called Alpha 17 instead of Pre-Beta.

But think about it from their perspective at RunRev. Damned if they do, 
Damned if they don't. People will be complaining either way until 2.0 
is actually released. Not an easy situation to be in.

Personally I was just frustrated because I really wanted to do some 
serious testing and start learning some of the new 2.0 features, but am 
not able to because the IDE is still too buggy to work with. However 
I've only been programming RunRev for a couple of months; so I'm not 
the best judge of how far along it is really.

Alex Rice, Software Developer
Architectural Research Consultants, Inc.
alrice at ARCplanning.com
alrice at swcp.com






More information about the use-livecode mailing list