Building "serious" scientific applications with RunRev...
alex at mindlube.com
Fri Nov 8 11:44:01 EST 2002
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 06:49 AM, Peter Lundh wrote:
> This autumn I started my PhD on Colour Imaging Science at the Derby
> University, UK. A requirement at the institute is knowledge of MatLab
> "C" - MatLab for modeling and C for compiling applications. MatLab I
> so that's ok - but now I have to learn "C" on top of all the other
> things I
> have to do.
> So my question is the following: Could Revolution (since I'm already
> familiar with it and like it!) be a substitute for "C" when developing
> scientific applications? Typical needs would be the ability to read,
> manipulate, display and output different types of image data,
> Possibility to
> compute Matrix, Fourier and Polynomial algorithms etc.
I don't have any direct experience, but here is my opinion-- Revolution
would be no match for a highly optimized C library for a particular
purpose, like imaging or crunching matrices and things.
If I were you, I would go ahead and learn C. C is not a very big or
complex language; Unlike C++ <shudder> which is a monster of a
language. Get the book _The C Programming Language_ by Kernighan and
Ritchie (270pp) which will get you up to speed on ANSI C.
Then you could learn how to write Revolution externals. Then you can
have the best of both worlds: Quickly build apps with nice GUIs in
Revolution, which have access to Matlab or other imaging and math
libraries that exist out there. If there is a fast imaging or maths
library that exists out there, it's probably written in C and you don't
want to spend time rewriting it in Rev. You want to start using it ASAP
and that's where externals come in.
Not that I have ever written an external or anything, mind you. ;-)
Alex Rice, Software Developer
Architectural Research Consultants, Inc.
alrice at swcp.com
alex_rice at arc.to
More information about the Use-livecode