Standardizing codepoints

[hakan at exformedia.se]

What do you mean with standard? Do you mean that some combined codepoints show up as one glyph and your question is if there is one codepoint for every such combination? Or do you mean that several seemingly identical glyphs might have different codepoints? Unicode actually has a good introduction on their site: https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode10.0.0/ch01.pdf
that might answer some of your questions.

:-Håkan
On 15 Nov 2020, 11:16 +0100, scott--- via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com>, wrote:
> I’m a little over my head in this area so I may not be describing this quite right…
> Some unicode glyphs seem to be describable with different (arrangements of) codepoints. Is it possible to coerce the glyph to be described in a “standard” way?
>
> --
> Scott Morrow
>
> Elementary Software
> (Now with 20% less chalk dust!)
> web https://elementarysoftware.com/
> email scott at elementarysoftware.com
> booth 1-360-734-4701
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode