Control properties not included in the Property Inspector

[Richard Gaskin]

Monte Goulding wrote:

 >> On 7 Nov 2017, at 12:20 pm, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode 
<use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
 >>
 >> If an enhancement request is filed I'd prefer it be for an optional
 >> modifier to the existing function syntax, rather than littering the
 >> current function results with synonyms or subset-value props that
 >> aren't needed for automating property assignment.
 >
 > Hmm.. I must have got lost along the way here. I thought we were
 > discussing properties missing from the PI rather than from the
 > properties property.

Might have been.  Easy enough to make a PI that it doesn't seem to be 
worth talking about much.

Provided the things one would want to set can be obtain from the 
properties function.

Doesn't the PI rely on that?

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Systems
  Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
  ____________________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com