ambassador at fourthworld.com
Mon May 15 16:56:38 CEST 2017
David V Glasgow wrote:
> I recently finished a fixed term contract working for a pretty IT
> savvy NHS Trust. The NHS has been forced by central government to
> reallocate IT (and other infrastructure) monies to front line
> services. They are also trapped by legacy software with dependencies
> on old (and proprietary) Windows systems and software. Now obviously
> stupid, but actually historic stupidity which was in the 1990s
> disguised as good business and standard practice.
> Not to mention the Clinical Information Systems which look and behave
> as if it is still the 1990’s.
> Apart from that, everything is fine.
That's the sad reality of so many security budgets: they don't become
adequate until after it's too late.
The dependency on older unsafe software versions is one that's always
mystified me. I once worked for a vendor whose clients included several
large hospital networks, and one of them required us to deliver our app
in a way that would maintain compatibility with IE 6, years after
Microsoft warned customers to stop using it.
Subsequent versions of a software are generally supersets of features
found in earlier versions, with the only things missing as we go forward
When written to spec, it should move forward gracefully. Microsoft has
done a better job of maintaining backward compatibility than most.
So if someone writes an app that doesn't work going forward, dependent
on things specific to an outdated system, in effect their app is
dependent on bugs.
For any org to consider bug-dependent software "mission critical" should
raise eyebrows. For a hospital it seems even more serious.
But I understand how budgets tend to gloss over things like this. And
this week, even the most reluctant orgs do too.
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
Ambassador at FourthWorld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
More information about the use-livecode