intersect . . . invisible images

[Roger Eller]

On Jul 14, 2017 6:01 AM, "Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode" <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> It does seem illogical that while one can set levels of transparency with
interset
> an image can continue intersecting with another when it is, supposedly,
invisible . . .
>
> Certainly, having to explain THAT to children is going to make them take
an even
> more dim view of adults than I hope they do already.
>
> Best, Richmond.
>

An invisible image is like the wind.  When you intersect with it, you can
feel it and know it's there.  Adding dust particles to the wind is like
setting it's visible property to true.

~Roger